It would be easy to dismiss the finding as obvious — of course desperate people are less attractive, of course urgency repels. But a new study published in Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin is more precise than that, and the precision matters. It is not simply that wanting a relationship too much is a problem. It is that why you want one — the specific motivational structure underneath the desire — predicts, with statistical clarity, whether you will actually find one.
The study, led by Geoff MacDonald at the University of Toronto, followed more than 3,000 single adults between the ages of 18 and 39 for six months. At the start of the study, participants completed a new assessment called the Autonomous Motivation for Romantic Pursuit Scale, which measured not whether people wanted to be in a relationship, but what was driving that want. Six months later, the researchers checked back in to see who had entered a relationship and who hadn’t. The results were reported by PsyPost, and they repay more than a quick headline.
What the study actually measured
The AMRPS scale distinguished between several different types of romantic motivation, drawing on a framework called Self-Determination Theory, which has been used for decades to study motivation in contexts from education to sport. In that framework, the most autonomous forms of motivation are intrinsic — you do something because it genuinely interests or delights you — and identified, meaning you do it because it aligns with a considered personal value. Below those sit introjected motivations, where the action is driven by internal pressure: shame, guilt, the fear of feeling bad about yourself. And then there is external motivation, driven by social expectation or pressure from others.
Applied to dating, these categories map onto recognisable experiences. Someone with intrinsic motivation genuinely enjoys connection, finds dating interesting, likes the process as well as the prospect. Someone with identified motivation has thought about it and concluded that a long-term relationship is something they genuinely value in their life. Someone with negative introjected motivation, by contrast, is not exactly drawn toward a relationship so much as they are running from something: the feeling of failure, the shame of still being single, the sense that their worth as a person is partly contingent on having a partner.
What the study found, across more than 3,000 people and six months of follow-up, was that intrinsic and identified motivation predicted partnership. The people who entered relationships tended to be the ones who wanted them for the right reasons, to use a phrase that sounds simple but turns out to have real empirical weight. The people with negative introjected motivation — the ones driven most urgently by the need to avoid feeling like a failure — were, as MacDonald put it, “particularly unlikely to be in a relationship six months later.”
Why fear-based urgency works against you
This is where the finding gets more interesting than a general warning about neediness. Neediness is a description of how someone appears — clingy, anxious, overly available. The AMRPS data points to something upstream of appearance: the motivational structure that generates that behaviour, and that likely shapes the entire texture of how someone engages with dating before anyone else has had a chance to notice anything.
When the goal is to avoid feeling like a failure, the dating process becomes evaluative in a specific, corrosive way. Every interaction becomes a test: am I enough? Is this going somewhere? Will this resolve the underlying feeling? Dates stop being opportunities for genuine curiosity about another person and start being assessments of whether the discomfort of being single is about to end. The researchers controlled for age, gender, life satisfaction, and stated desire for a relationship, and the effect held. It is not simply that unhappy people are less likely to find relationships — though that is also true. It is that the particular structure of fear-based motivation changes how someone shows up when dating, in ways that are likely to be self-defeating regardless of their other qualities.
MacDonald was direct about the implication in a way that feels unusually honest coming from academic research. “It’s boring old wisdom,” he said, “but I think there is something to the idea that you need to get right with yourself first before putting yourself out there.” What the study adds to that old wisdom is a degree of precision. Getting right with yourself, in this context, doesn’t mean happiness or confidence in some general sense — it means something more specific: not needing a relationship to resolve an underlying question about your worth. The people who were most likely to partner were the ones for whom a relationship was something they genuinely wanted, not a solution to something they couldn’t otherwise fix.
The unexpected finding at the other end of the scale
There is a footnote to all of this that the researchers found worth examining. People who scored high on what the scale called amotivation — meaning they had no particular drive toward a committed relationship, no strong sense of wanting to partner up — turned out to be slightly more likely to have entered a relationship after six months, once other factors were controlled for. This runs against intuition. If wanting a relationship too badly works against you, and not wanting one much also seems to help, then the model of romantic success looks genuinely strange.
The researchers’ interpretation is careful and specific. They think the amotivated group are largely people who are sexually active and socially engaged without being invested in the outcome of commitment. They are, in a sense, available without being oriented toward availability as a goal. And occasionally — perhaps often enough to show up in the data — they catch feelings anyway. The relationship happens despite the lack of orientation toward it, rather than because of effort applied in that direction.
This doesn’t mean that the path to a relationship is to want one less. The study is not a prescription in any direction. But it does suggest that the relationship between wanting and getting, in this domain at least, is considerably more complicated than a simple correlation. The quality of the wanting matters more than the intensity of it.
What this leaves open
The study has a six-month window, which is enough time to be meaningful but not enough to trace longer arcs — whether, for example, someone with fear-based motivation eventually works through it and finds their way to partnership, or whether the pattern persists. It also, by design, measures stated motivation at a single point in time, which is not quite the same as the lived texture of how someone’s inner life actually shapes their behaviour across dozens of interactions over months.
What it does establish, with unusual clarity, is that the question of why someone wants a relationship carries real weight — more than conventional dating advice tends to acknowledge. The assumption in most popular frameworks is that the content of what you do matters most: what you say, how you present yourself, whether you’re on the right app at the right time. This research suggests that something more interior — the motivational architecture underneath the behaviour — is doing significant predictive work. The person who is genuinely curious about connection, and for whom a relationship would be an addition rather than a resolution, is, on average, more likely to find one. Not because they perform better, but because what drives them shapes how they’re actually present.
That is a more interesting finding than the headline version. And it is worth sitting with before drawing any conclusions about what it means for any particular person’s situation.
How Sharp Is Your Era Memory?
Every memorization style can reflect a different way of holding the past—through feelings, stories, details, or senses. This beautiful visual quiz reveals how your mind naturally stores what matters and what that says about the way you experience life.
✨ 10 questions. Instant results. Guided by shaman Rudá Iandê’s teachings.
