Editor’s note: This article was reviewed and updated in July 2026 to meet The Vessel’s latest editorial standards.
For years I was convinced my parents just didn’t get me. Every miscommunication, every moment of feeling unseen, every time they seemed to choose anything else over what I needed — it all felt deeply personal. I carried those impressions into adulthood like a settled verdict, the way children do when they’re the only narrators available to them.
Then I became a parent. And somewhere between the 3 AM feedings and the tenth diaper change of the day, the verdict started to wobble. Not because the memories changed, but because I suddenly had access to information I hadn’t had before: the experience of being on the other side.
What followed wasn’t a simple forgiveness arc or a softening of old grievances. It was something stranger and more useful — a gradual recognition that most of what had confused or hurt me as a child was never really about me at all. That realization doesn’t erase anything. But it does shift what the evidence means.
The improvisation nobody admits to
When my daughter arrived, I waited for some instinctive parental wisdom to surface. It didn’t. What arrived instead was a sustained low-grade uncertainty — googling “is this normal?” at 2 AM, making rules on the spot, hoping the decisions I was inventing in real time would hold up later. As James Keenan is quoted in a Psychology Today essay by Michael W. Austin, “I realize now that all the categories I created to understand my parents were nothing more than the deep and lasting impressions of a child.”
The seemingly arbitrary bedtime, the rules that made no sense, the inconsistencies that felt like indifference — most of it was improvisation under pressure. Parents are reading something they read somewhere, arguing with a toddler about vegetables for the third time that week, trying to produce a reasonably functional human without a reliable map. The authority children perceive is largely projected. From inside the role, it feels much more like guesswork.
What this recognition costs is the version of childhood where a parent’s every decision carried hidden meaning. What it gives back is something more honest: the image of two people doing their best with what they had, which is both less dramatic and easier to live with.
The emotional math of limited bandwidth
Growing up, I sometimes felt my parents were physically present but mentally somewhere else entirely. They’d be in the room but not quite there, and I read that distance as a signal — that I wasn’t interesting enough, or important enough, to hold their attention. That interpretation made sense from where I was standing. It just wasn’t the full picture.
After a full workday, adult responsibilities, and the constant low-level management that parenting requires, the emotional tank runs dry in ways that are hard to anticipate until you’re living it. The love doesn’t disappear. But the capacity to express it in the ways a child needs — presence, patience, responsiveness — gets rationed in ways that feel almost involuntary. You’re not choosing to check out. You’re just out of fuel.
The same logic applies to impatience. “Not now.” “Ask me later.” “Can’t you see I’m busy?” Those phrases used to make me feel like my needs were an annoyance. Parenthood has taught me that mental load is real and cumulative — that when you’re holding work deadlines, meal planning, doctor appointments, and household logistics all at once, your bandwidth for one more question, even a small one, can genuinely be zero. The child who hears “not now” experiences a rejection. The parent saying it is usually just at capacity, not making a statement about worth. The gap between those two realities is where a lot of long-term misunderstanding lives.
Fear as the shape love takes
I used to interpret my parents’ worrying as a kind of doubt — a signal that they didn’t quite believe I was capable. Every “be careful” felt like a qualifier on my competence. Every check-in felt like surveillance. Now I watch my daughter move through the world, and I understand that the anxiety was never really about her abilities. It was about the size of what I stood to lose.
When you love something that much, the world rearranges itself into potential threats. The hovering that felt suffocating was fear wearing the costume of caution. It wasn’t a verdict on capability — it was the cost of caring about someone in a world that doesn’t guarantee their safety. Children can’t see this from the inside. They experience the behavior without access to the feeling driving it, and so the behavior gets misread.
The same is true of decisions that looked like favoritism. “Why does he get to stay up later?” “How come she doesn’t have to eat her vegetables?” What looked like inconsistency or preferential treatment was usually just exhausted parents picking their battles. One child got the later bedtime because fighting it would have meant a meltdown nobody had energy for. Another got away with skipping the vegetables because three other battles had already been lost that day. The child who felt shortchanged was reading scarcity as rejection. The parent was just trying to get through the evening.
The person they were before you arrived
Here is something that rarely gets named: becoming a parent involves a kind of identity disappearance. The person you were before children exists in a different tense — not gone, exactly, but no longer continuous with the present. Your parents had ambitions, habits, relationships, and a self-conception that predated you entirely. And while most parents wouldn’t undo the choice, there is still a grief that runs alongside it, for the life that closed when another opened.
That distant look in a parent’s eyes, the one that children sometimes interpret as boredom or absence — it may have been something closer to memory. Someone privately accounting for what they gave up and what they got, which is a complicated ledger even when the answer is clearly worth it. It wasn’t about regretting the child in front of them. It was about processing the layered reality that love can be the best thing that ever happened to you and still require enormous sacrifice. Children aren’t equipped to hold that complexity on their parents’ behalf, and they shouldn’t have to be. But understanding it later changes what that look meant.
The patterns that felt most painful — the emotional distance, the moments of harshness, the repeating dynamics — also had a lineage. Your parents were once children themselves, raised by people working with even less understanding of emotional development. Henry Ward Beecher wrote that we never know the love of a parent until we become parents ourselves. But the same threshold reveals something else: you also begin to understand, for the first time, what your parents were up against — including what they inherited and couldn’t fully see.
When love doesn’t arrive in the right shape
Perhaps the hardest recognition is this: your parents almost certainly loved you, and the way they expressed it may still have missed what you needed. Those two things can both be true, and keeping them together is more useful than collapsing into either one alone.
Some parents show love by working long hours to provide, while the child needed time. Some express care through criticism they genuinely believe is useful, while the child needed acceptance. Some offer independence when the child wanted guidance, or closeness when the child was asking, quietly, for space. The mismatch between how love is given and how it needs to be received is not evidence of indifference. It’s evidence of the limits of self-knowledge — people can only give from what they have, and they can only give it in the shapes they know.
Becoming a parent doesn’t resolve any of this. The old wounds don’t disappear because you now understand their likely origin. But something does shift — not toward excuse-making or enforced forgiveness, but toward a fuller account of what actually happened. They were people before they were parents. They were guessing, running low, carrying their own inherited patterns, loving imperfectly in the ways available to them. So are you, now. That recognition doesn’t close the gap between what you needed and what you got. But it changes the story you tell about it.
Note: If processing these reflections surfaces old pain that feels difficult to hold alone, speaking with a therapist or counsellor can be a genuinely useful next step.
Did you like my article? Like me on Facebook to see more articles like this in your feed.
