Psychology says people who apologise constantly for small things aren’t overly polite or neurotic — they often learned as children that keeping everyone else comfortable was their job, and that any tension in the room was somehow theirs to fix

I once had a floor manager who apologised to a chair. She had walked into it. She said sorry to it, out loud, in front of a full room, and then carried on seating a party of six.

She also apologised for the weather, for a supplier who missed a delivery, for a customer who arrived drunk and left angrier. She was the best manager I ever employed. She was also, in a way I could never explain at the time, exhausting to stand next to.

For years I filed her under politeness. Nice person, volume knob stuck. Then I read some of the actual research and had to revise the file.

What the sorry is really doing

In restaurants you learn apology as a piece of equipment. The soup was cold, you say the words, you take it off the bill, the table settles. The apology has a job, a shape, and an ending. You can watch it work.

Constant apologising has none of those parts. There is no offence, no repair, and no point at which the thing is finished. It is scanning the room instead.

Karina Schumann and Michael Ross ran a diary study in 2010 asking people to log every offence they committed or suffered for about a fortnight. The people who apologised more were not more remorseful. They were counting more things as offences in the first place. Same behaviour, lower bar.

That is the whole mechanism. A very low bar for what counts as your fault.

Where the bar gets set that low

Psychologists have been measuring this for decades under names nobody uses at dinner.

Dana Jack and Diana Dill built the Silencing the Self Scale in 1992 to capture a set of learned rules about keeping relationships safe by staying quiet. Two of the items read like a transcript of my old floor manager: feeling personally answerable for other people’s moods, and losing track of your own thoughts because you spend so much energy tracking everyone else’s.

Vicki Helgeson and Heidi Fritz have a parallel idea they call unmitigated communion, which is caring about other people to the exclusion of yourself. One item on their scale simply asks whether you rank your own needs last, every single time, without exception. Ordinary kindness sits alongside a self you have quietly deleted.

Neither of those is a personality flaw you arrive with. They are rules, and rules get taught. The research closest to the teaching is on parentification, which is what happens when a child ends up managing the emotional weather of the house. Lisa Hooper and colleagues pooled twelve studies covering about 2,500 adults and found a real link between that childhood role and difficulty later on.

Worth being straight about the size of that link: small, correlational, and one route among several. Apologising too much does not prove something happened to you at eight years old. It does mean the habit was probably useful once, in a room where somebody’s mood was the weather and you were the barometer.

One more caveat. I have lived in five countries, and in some of them a constant sorry is simply grammar, a social lubricant with nothing behind it. Good to know which one you are doing.

What the habit costs you

Two things go wrong.

The first is internal. A review published this year gathered 126 studies using that self-silencing scale and found it consistently tracks depressive symptoms. Most of that work is correlational and most of it was done on women, so nobody has proven the direction of the arrow. Still, 126 studies pointing the same way is worth a pause.

The second showed up on the floor. If you apologise for everything, your apology stops carrying information. Nobody can tell when something has genuinely gone wrong, including you. I had staff who said sorry so often that I learned to ignore it, which meant that on the night one of them was actually in trouble, I missed it entirely.

There is a smaller cost too. Sorry is often a request in disguise. “Sorry, would you mind moving your bag?” “Sorry, could I get the bill?” The want is in there, wearing an apology so it can get through unnoticed.

Small ways to put the word down

I am not going to tell you to stop apologising. Try these instead, in roughly this order of difficulty.

Swap it for thanks. “Sorry I’m late” becomes “thanks for waiting.” Same information, and the other person gets something rather than being asked to absorb something.

Cut it out of writing. Keep it in the first draft. Delete it in the second. Emails survive this operation better than you expect.

Name the offence before you apologise for it. If you cannot say what you did, the sorry has nothing to attach to and you can let it go.

Sit in the two seconds. Most of these apologies exist to end a silence quickly. Let one silence run and notice that nothing collapses.

Then keep the real ones. Apologise properly, in full sentences, when you have actually stood on someone’s foot. That is what the word is for, and it works far better when it has been resting.

My old floor manager runs her own place now, two hours out of the city. She says “thanks for waiting.” I have never asked her about it.

Picture of Daniel Moran

Daniel Moran

Daniel Moran is a writer at Brown Brothers Media and one of the network’s top-performing contributors. He covers psychology, technology, and culture across multiple publications, including Silicon Canals, VegOut, and The Vessel. Learn more on his Brown Brothers Media team page.
Scroll to Top