I’m turning 44 this month, and I’ve been thinking about last year’s birthday—spent entirely alone in Singapore, wondering if I was failing at life. No one special to share that supposedly special day with. That solitary day forced me to confront truths I’d been avoiding for years. Now, on the other side of that reckoning, in a relationship that actually works because I stopped trying to make relationships work, I can see how necessary that loneliness was.
Last year around this time, I shared some life lessons that had taken me four decades to learn:
Those insights still hold true, but another year of living has revealed new recognitions—the kind that only become visible after enough repetitions. The lessons that matter most aren’t the ones we seek out. They’re the ones that find us in the gap between who we think we are and who we’re becoming.
Here’s what I’ve discovered about the performances we can’t stop giving.
For years, I played the successful entrepreneur—the guy who had it all figured out, who turned crisis into opportunity with a knowing smile. I performed this character so well that I convinced everyone, including myself. The problem with a convincing performance is that people fall in love with it. They hire it, date it, build friendships with it.
Then you’re trapped. Every interaction requires maintaining the illusion. You can’t have a bad day because the character doesn’t have bad days. You can’t admit uncertainty because the character lives in perpetual clarity. I became an expert at discussing five-year plans while privately planning my exit. The exhaustion isn’t just from lying—it’s from the constant translation between who you are and who you’re pretending to be.
The day I finally cracked—admitting to my girlfriend that I was terrified of intimacy despite my confident exterior—I expected rejection. Instead, I got recognition. She told me she felt like she’d been dating a TED talk, not a person.
That’s when I learned: the person you’re performing is the person you’ll have to keep being. Forever. Unless you stop.
What I didn’t understand then was how our escapes become our prisons. In my 20s, constant motion saved me. Whenever life got too heavy, I’d book a flight. Relationship challenges? Move to Thailand. Career questions? Try Vietnam. Family tensions? Singapore sounds nice.
Movement felt like progress, and for a while, it was. Each new city taught me something, each fresh start built resilience.
But coping mechanisms are like pain medication—what heals in acute situations becomes harmful when chronically applied. The pattern became clear during a conversation with my brother in Saigon. He was watching me plan yet another move when he said something that hit home: I’d gotten so good at starting over that I never had to actually finish anything.
He was right. I’d turned reinvention into a way to avoid transformation. I’d leave relationships the moment they required real vulnerability. I’d restructure businesses instead of addressing fundamental issues. I’d mistake geography for therapy.
Your coping mechanisms will eventually become the problem. The very things that save you in crisis can imprison you in comfort.
This pattern of escape showed up everywhere, especially in what I was defending. I spent years defending my choices—the nomadic lifestyle, the unconventional career path, the resistance to traditional markers of adulthood. I had eloquent arguments for why my way was better, more evolved, more authentic. I could explain for hours why settling down was settling for less.
But the vehemence of my defense should have been a clue. We don’t build elaborate fortifications around things we’re genuinely secure about. The shift came when someone asked me: “What would happen if you stopped defending it?” The silence that followed revealed something uncomfortable: I was defending a life that had stopped fitting years ago.
The life you’re defending might be the life you need to leave. Not because it’s wrong, but because you’ve outgrown it. Today, my life includes elements I once mocked—stability, routine, a relationship that requires me to consider someone else’s needs. The younger me would be horrified. The current me is just grateful I stopped listening to him.
Around this time, I stumbled onto a distinction that changed everything: the difference between happiness and being alive. We’ve been sold the idea that mental health exists on a spectrum from depressed to happy, that the goal is to move from one end to the other.
But I’ve lived in states of genuine happiness that felt utterly lifeless—successful, comfortable, and completely numb. And I’ve experienced periods of struggle that, despite their difficulty, hummed with aliveness.
I discovered this during the collapse of a business partnership. From the outside, everything looked perfect—we were growing, profitable, checking all the success boxes. But I felt like I was slowly suffocating. Every morning required more effort to maintain the façade of enthusiasm. I wasn’t depressed in any clinical sense—I was something worse: I was absent from my own life.
When I finally walked away, I lost financial security and faced massive uncertainty. But I could breathe again. The problems were real, immediate, mine. There’s something deeply vitalizing about facing actual challenges instead of managing the appearance of success.
The opposite of depression isn’t happiness—it’s vitality. And vitality comes from engagement with reality, not escape from it.
This revelation about vitality helped me understand something crucial about other people. Most people are doing the best they can, and it’s often not very good. We’re all fumbling through life with incomplete information, unhealed wounds, and inherited patterns we don’t fully understand.
The parent who damaged you was damaged too. The partner who betrayed you was betraying themselves first. The friend who disappeared was drowning in their own storm.
I learned this watching my parents age. The authority figures of my childhood became regular people—flawed, trying, often failing. Their shaping of me wasn’t part of some grand plan. They were just doing what they could with what they had.
This doesn’t excuse harm or eliminate accountability. But when you truly grasp that everyone—including you—is doing their limited best with their limited resources, something shifts. You stop taking things personally. You stop making your peace contingent on receiving what’s never coming.
If everyone’s just doing their best, what happens when that best becomes “successful”? There’s a myth that success transforms you, that achieving your goals will somehow make you a different person. When my work started reaching millions of readers, I expected to feel different. More confident, more certain, more something.
Instead, all my existing patterns just played out on a bigger stage.
I watched a fellow entrepreneur build a company worth tens of millions, only to become more paranoid about people using him for his money—a fear he’d always carried, now magnified by actual wealth. Another friend’s success in publishing made her more generous with mentoring others—but she’d always been generous, just with fewer resources.
Success is a magnifying glass, not a magic wand. It amplifies who you already are. The real work is becoming someone you’d want to be more of.
But here’s the cosmic joke: by the time you become that person, you’ll be someone else entirely. We make plans based on who we are now, but by the time those plans materialize, we’re different people. The life you’re carefully constructing is designed for a version of you that’s already disappearing.
Five years ago, I crafted a vision of success that revolved around complete independence—financial, emotional, geographical. I built systems to support that vision, made sacrifices to achieve it. And I succeeded. By every metric I’d established, I won.
The only problem? The person who wanted that life no longer existed. Somewhere in the process of achieving total independence, I’d discovered the poverty of self-sufficiency. The structures I’d built were perfectly designed to keep out the very connections I’d learned to value.
The future you’re building is already obsolete. This isn’t an argument against planning or ambition. It’s a recognition that our targets are always moving because we’re always moving. The solution isn’t to stop building—it’s to build with open hands.
As I write this from Singapore, in a life that looks nothing like what I planned but everything like what I needed, I can see how these seven recognitions form a single truth: we’re constantly becoming, and the moment we think we’ve arrived, we’ve already begun departing.
The performance that traps us, the coping mechanisms that imprison us, the lives we defend past their expiration, the vitality we mistake for happiness, the humanity in everyone’s limitations, the amplification of success, the obsolescence of our carefully laid plans—they’re all symptoms of the same condition. We’re human. We’re changing. We’re never quite who we think we are.
Maybe that’s what your 40s really teach you—not that you’ve figured things out, but that “figuring things out” was always the wrong goal. The point isn’t to solve your life like an equation. It’s to live it like the ongoing experiment it is.
These insights will probably seem quaint to the person I’ll be at 54. He’ll have his own hard-won recognitions that contradict everything I currently believe. And that’s exactly as it should be. Growth isn’t about accumulating truth—it’s about being willing to let each truth evolve when a deeper understanding emerges.
So here’s to another year of unlearning what I thought I knew, of building things I’ll eventually outgrow, of becoming someone I can’t yet imagine. Here’s to the beautiful instability of being human.
Even if it means that last year’s dramatic solitary birthday now seems like exactly the teacher I needed.
Just launched: The Vessel’s Youtube Channel
Explore our first video: The Brain Beneath Our Feet — a short-film by shaman Rudá Iandê that challenges where we believe intelligence comes from.
Instead of looking to the stars or machines, Rudá invites us to consider that the first great mind on Earth may have existed without a brain at all… and that the oldest form of thought might be living beneath our feet.
Watch Now:
Did you like my article? Like me on Facebook to see more articles like this in your feed.
